Protestantism
English
Dare any of you, having a matter against another, go to law before the unjust, and not before the saints?
Dare any of you, having a matter against his neighbor, go to law before the unrighteous, and not before the saints?
Dare any one of you, having a matter with the other, go to be judged before the unrighteous, and not before the saints?
Dare any one of you, having a matter against another, prosecute his suit before the unjust, and not before the saints?
Dare any of you, hauing businesse against an other, be iudged vnder the vniust, and not vnder the Saintes?
How dare one of you havinge busines with another goo to lawe vnder the wicked and not rather vnder the sainctes?
Dare any of you, having a matter against the other, go to law before the unrighteous and not before the sanctified?
1 The Corinthians must not vex their brethren, in going to law with them: 6 Especially under Infidels, 9 The unrighteous shall not inherite the kingdom of God. 15 Our bodies are the members of Christ, 19 And Temples of the Holy Ghost. 16. 17 They must not therefore be defiled.
Dare any of you, having a matter against another, go to law before the unjust, and not before the saints?
Does any one of you that has a matter of dispute with another, presume to be judged before the unrighteous, and not before the saints?
How is it, that if any one of you has a cause at law against another, he takes it before a Gentile judge and not before the saints?
If any of you has a grievance against another, how dare he go to law before the unrighteous instead of before the saints!
DARE any of you, having a matter of controversy with another, sue for judgment before the unjust, and not before the saints?
Dare any of you, having a matter against another, go unto judgment before the unjust, and not before the saints?
DARE any of you, having a matter against another, go to law before the unjust, and not before the saints?
Lawsuits between Believers
Does anyone among you, if he1 has a matter against someone else, dare to go to court before the unrighteous, and not before the saints?
- *Here “if” is supplied as a component of the participle (“has”) which is understood as conditional
Does anyone of you having a matter against another dare to be judged before the unjust, and not before the saints?
Do any of you dare, when you have a matter against another, to go to law before the unjust, and not before the saints?
Dare any of you, having a matter against his neighbor, go to law before the unrighteous, and not before the saints?
Dare any of you, having a matter against his neighbor, go to law before the unrighteous, and not before the saints?
Dare any of you, having a matter against his neighbor, go to law before the unrighteous, and not before the saints?
Doth any one of you, who hath a matter against another, dare to go to law before the unrighteous, and not before the holy?
Can it be that, when one of you has a dispute with another, they dare to have their case tried before the heathen, instead of before Christ’s people?
Can it be that, when one of you has a dispute with another, they dare to have their case tried before the heathen, instead of before Christ’s people?
Dare any of you, having a matter against another, go to law before the unjust, and not before the saints?
Dare any of you, having a matter against another, go to law before the unjust, and not before the saints?
Dare any of you, having, a matter against his brother, sue for judgment before the unrighteous, and not before the saints?
Dare any of you, having a matter against another, go to law before the unjust, and not before the saints?
Can it be that, when one of you has a dispute with another, he dares to have his case tried before the heathen, instead of before Christ’s People?
Dare any of you, having a matter against another, go to law before the unjust, and not before the saints?
Catholicism
English
Dare any of you, having a matter against another, go to be judged before the unjust: and not before the saints?