Protestantism
English
Oh that one would hear me! behold, my desire is, that the Almighty would answer me, and that mine adversary had written a book.1
- my…: or, my sign is that the Almighty will
Oh that I had one to hear me! (Lo, here is my signature, let the Almighty answer me) And that I had the indictment which mine adversary hath written!
Who giveth to me a hearing? lo, my mark. The Mighty One doth answer me, And a bill hath mine adversary written.
Oh that I had one to hear me! Behold my signature: let the Almighty answer me! And let mine opponent write an accusation!
Oh that I had some to heare me! beholde my signe that the Almightie will witnesse for me: though mine aduersary should write a booke against me,
O that I had someone to hear me (Lo, here is my signature, let the Almighty answer me), and that I had the indictment which my adversary has written!
Oh that one would hear me! behold, my desire is, that the Almighty would answer me, and that my adversary had written a book.
If only God would give ear to me, and the Ruler of all would give me an answer! or if what he has against me had been put in writing!
(Oh, that I had one to hear me! Here is my signature. Let the Almighty answer me; let my accuser compose an indictment.
Oh that I had one to hear me! --Lo, here is my signature, let the Almighty answer me--and that I had the indictment which mine adversary hath written!
Oh that someone would hear me! Behold, my mark [is], [that] the Almighty will testify for me, even though my adversary had written down the charges.
Oh that one would hear me! behold, my desire is, that the Almighty would answer me, and that mine adversary had written a book.
⌞O that⌟1 ⌞I had⌟2 someone hearing me! Here is my signature; let Shaddai answer me! ⌞As for⌟3 the written communication that ⌞my adversary⌟4 has written,
- Literally “Who shall give”
- Literally “for me”
- Hebrew “And,” or “But”
- Literally “the man of my indictment”
Oh that I had one to hear me! See, my mark! Let the Almighty answer me, and let my Accuser write an indictment.
Oh that I had one to hear me! Behold my mark. Let the Almighty answer me, and my Accuser write an indictment.
oh that I had one to hear me! (behold, here is my signature, let the Almighty answer me); let the accuser write my indictment!
oh that I had one to hear me! (behold, here is my signature, let the Almighty answer me); let the accuser write my indictment!
oh that I had one to hear me! (behold, here is my signature, let the Almighty answer me); let the accuser write my indictment!
O that there were one who would hear me! Behold my signature! let the Almighty answer me. And let mine adversary write down his charge!
Oh that one would hear me! behold, my desire is, that the Almighty would answer me, and that mine adversary had written a book.1
- my…: or, my sign is that the Almighty will.
Oh that one would hear me! behold, my desire is, that the Almighty would answer me, and that mine adversary had written a book.
Oh that I had one to hear me, Lo! my crossmark, May, the Almighty, answer me! And would that, a book, mine opponent had written!
O that one would hear me! behold, my desire is, that the Almighty would answer me, and that my adversary had written a book.1
- my...: or, my sign is that the Almighty will
Oh that one would hear me! behold, my desire is, that the Almighty would answer me, and that mine adversary had written a book.
Catholicism
English
Who would grant me a hearing, that the Almighty may hear my desire: and that he himself that judgeth would write a book,
then, would he grant me a hearing, so that the Almighty would listen to my desire, and he who judges would himself write a book,1
- 31:35Again, the word ‘quis’ in Latin does not always mean ‘who,’ even when used in a question. In this case, Job is referring to all of the previous ‘if...’ propositions, saying, if all of these faults had been found in Job, would He still grant Job a favorable hearing and a clear vindication? No, He would not. ‘Quis’ is here used as a pronoun referring to God.(Conte)