Protestantism
English
and because he needed not that any one should bear witness concerning man; for he himself knew what was in man.
and because he had no need that any should testify concerning man, for he himself was knowing what was in man.
and that he had not need that any should testify of man, for himself knew what was in man.
And had no neede that any should testifie of man: for he knewe what was in man.
and neded not that eny man shuld testify of man. For he knewe what was in man.
and because he had no need that any man should testify about man, for he himself knew what was in man.
And needed not that any should testify of man: for he knew what was in man.
and had no need that any one should testify of man, for he himself knew what was in man.
He had no need for any witness about man; for he himself had knowledge of what was in man.
He did not need any testimony about man, for He knew what was in a man.
and because he had no need that any man should testify respecting man; for he knew what was in man.
and needed not that any man should give testimony, for he knew what was in man.:
and because he did not ⌞need⌟1 anyone ⌞to testify⌟2 about man, for he himself knew what was in man.3
- Literally “have need that”
- Literally “should testify”
- *Here “man” has been retained rather than the generic “people” to maintain the connection with the following verse
and because He had no need that anyone should witness concerning man, for He knew what was in man.
and did not need that anyone should testify of man. For He knew what was in man.
and because he did not need for anyone to testify concerning man; for he himself knew what was in man.
and because he did not need for anyone to testify concerning man; for he himself knew what was in man.
and because he did not need for anyone to testify concerning man; for he himself knew what was in man.
and had no need that any one should testify concerning man; for he himself knew what was in man.
He did not need anyone to tell him about people because he could read what was in them..
He did not need anyone to tell him about people because he could read what was in them..
and because he had, no need, that anyone should bear witness concerning man; for, he, understood what was in man.
And needed not that any should testify concerning man: for he knew what was in man.
and because he did not need that others should tell him what men were; for he could of himself read what was in men.
Catholicism