Protestantism
English
To have respect of persons is not good: for for a piece of bread that man will transgress.
To have respect of persons is not good; Neither that a man should transgress for a piece of bread.
To have respect of persons is not good; but for a piece of bread will a man transgress.
To haue respect of persons is not good: for that man will transgresse for a piece of bread.
To have respect of persons is not good, nor that a man should transgress for a piece of bread.
To have respect of persons is not good: for for a piece of bread that man will transgress.
It is not good to have respect for a man's position: for a man will do wrong for a bit of bread.
To show partiality is not good, yet a man will do wrong for a piece of bread.
To have respect of persons is not good; for a man will transgress for a piece of bread.
To have respect of persons [in judgment] is not good; even for a piece of bread, man will transgress.
To have respect of persons is not good: for for a piece of bread that man will transgress.
⌞Showing partiality⌟1 is not good, and over a morsel of bread, a strong man will do wrong.
- Literally “Recognizing faces”
To respect faces is not good, yea, for a man will transgress for a piece of bread.
To have respect of persons is not good; yea, for a piece of bread a man will transgress.
To show partiality is not good; yet a man will do wrong for a piece of bread.
To show partiality is not good; yet a man will do wrong for a piece of bread.
To have respect to persons is not good; Since for a piece of bread that man will transgress.
To have respect of persons is not good: for for a piece of bread that man will transgress.
To have respect of persons is not good: for a piece of bread that man will transgress.
To take note of faces [in judgment], is not good, and, for a bit of bread, a man will transgress.
To have respect of persons is not good: for for a piece of bread that man will transgress.
To have respect of persons is not good: for for a piece of bread that man will transgress.
Catholicism