Protestantism
English
Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?
Or hath not the potter a right over the clay, from the same lump to make one part a vessel unto honor, and another unto dishonor?
hath not the potter authority over the clay, out of the same lump to make the one vessel to honour, and the one to dishonour?
Or has not the potter authority over the clay, out of the same lump to make one vessel to honour, and another to dishonour?
Hath not the potter power of the clay to make of the same lumpe one vessell to honour, and another vnto dishonour?
Hath not the potter power over the claye even of the same lompe to make one vessell vnto honoure and a nother vnto dishonoure?
Or has the potter no right over the clay, from the same lump certainly to make this vessel for esteem, and that for disesteem?
Has not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel to honor, and another to dishonor?
Has not the potter power over the clay, to make from the same mass one vessel for honor, and another for dishonor?
Or has not the potter the right to make out of one part of his earth a vessel for honour, and out of another a vessel for shame?
Does not the potter have the right to make from the same lump of clay one vessel for special occasions and another for common use?
Hath not the potter power over the clay, from the same mass to make one vessel for an honourable use, and another for a dishonourable?
Has not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour and another unto dishonour?
Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?
Or does the potter not have authority over the clay, to make from the same lump a vessel that is for ⌞honorable use⌟1 and one that is for ⌞ordinary use⌟2?
- Literally “honor”
- Literally “dishonor”
Or does not the potter have authority over the clay, out of the one lump to make one vessel to honor, and one to dishonor? Jer. 18:6
Does not the potter have power over the clay, from the same lump to make one vessel to honor and another to dishonor?
Or hasn't the potter a right over the clay, from the same lump to make one part a vessel for honor, and another for dishonor?
Or hasn't the potter a right over the clay, from the same lump to make one part a vessel for honor, and another for dishonor?
Or hasn't the potter a right over the clay, from the same lump to make one part a vessel for honor, and another for dishonor?
Hath not the potter a right out of the same lump of clay to make one vessel for an honorable use, and another for a dishonorable?
Has not the potter absolute power over their clay, so that out of the same lump they make one thing for better, and another for common, use?
Has not the potter absolute power over their clay, so that out of the same lump they make one thing for better, and another for common, use?
Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?
Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?
Or hath not the potter a right over the clay—out of the same lump, to make some, indeed, into a vessel for honour, and some for dishonour?
Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel to honour, and another to dishonour?
Has not the potter absolute power over his clay, so that out of the same lump he makes one thing for better, and another for common, use?
Has not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?
Catholicism
English
Or hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump, to make one vessel unto honour and another unto dishonour?
And does not the potter have the authority over the clay to make, from the same material, indeed, one vessel unto honor, yet truly another unto disgrace?1
- 9:21The potter: This similitude is used only to show that we are not to dispute with our Maker, nor to reason with him why he does not give as much grace to one as to another; for since the whole lump of our clay is vitiated by sin, it is owing to his goodness and mercy, that he makes out of it so many vessels of honor; and it is no more than just, that others, in punishment of their unrepented sins, should be given up to be vessels of dishonor.(Challoner)