Protestantism
English
But when Peter was come to Antioch, I withstood him to the face, because he was to be blamed.
But when Cephas came to Antioch, I resisted him to the face, because he stood condemned.
And when Peter came to Antioch, to the face I stood up against him, because he was blameworthy,
But when Peter came to Antioch, I withstood him to [the] face, because he was to be condemned:
And when Peter was come to Antiochia, I withstood him to his face: for he was to be condemned.
But when Peter came to Antioch I opposed him to the face, because he was blameworthy.
But when Peter was come to Antioch, I withstood him to the face, because he was to be blamed.
But when Peter came to Antioch, I openly opposed him, because he had incurred blame.
But when Cephas came to Antioch, I made a protest against him to his face, because he was clearly in the wrong.
Paul Confronts Cephas
When Cephas came to Antioch, however, I opposed him to his face, because he stood to be condemned.
But when Peter came to Antioch I withstood him to his face, because he was blameable.
But when Peter was come to Antioch, I withstood him to the face because he was to be blamed.
But when Peter was come to Antioch, I withstood him to the face, because he was to be blamed.
Paul Confronts Peter at Antioch
But when Cephas came to Antioch, I opposed him to his face, because he was condemned.
But when Peter came to Antioch, I opposed him to his face, because he was to be blamed.
But when Peter came to Antioch, I opposed him to his face, because he was to be blamed.
But when Cephas1 came to Antioch, I resisted him to his face, because he stood condemned.
- NU P Vg. M TR read "Peter" instead of "Cephas"
But when Cephas1 came to Antioch, I resisted him to his face, because he stood condemned.
- NU P Vg. M TR read "Peter" instead of "Cephas"
But when Cephas1 came to Antioch, I resisted him to his face, because he stood condemned.
- NU P Vg. M TR read "Peter" instead of "Cephas"
But when Cephas came to Antioch, I withstood him to the face; for he was condemned.
But, when Peter came to Antioch, I opposed him to his face; for he stood self-condemned.
But, when Peter came to Antioch, I opposed him to his face; for he stood self-condemned.
¶ But when Peter was come to Antioch, I withstood him to the face, because he was to be blamed.
But when Peter was come to Antioch, I withstood him to the face, because he was to be blamed.
But, when Cephas came unto Antioch, to the face, [even], him, I resisted, because he stood condemned;
But when Peter had come to Antioch, I withstood him to the face, because he was to be blamed.
But, when Peter came to Antioch, I opposed him to his face; for he stood self-condemned.
But when Peter was come to Antioch, I withstood him to the face, because he was to be blamed.
Catholicism
English
But when Cephas was come to Antioch, I withstood him to the face, because he was to be blamed.
But when Cephas had arrived at Antioch, I stood against him to his face, because he was blameworthy.1
- 2:11I withstood, etc: The fault that is here noted in the conduct of St. Peter, was only a certain imprudence, in withdrawing himself from the table of the Gentiles, for fear of giving offence to the Jewish converts; but this, in such circumstances, when his so doing might be of ill consequence to the Gentiles, who might be induced thereby to think themselves obliged to conform to the Jewish way of living, to the prejudice of their Christian liberty. Neither was St. Paul’s reprehending him any argument against his supremacy; for in such cases an inferior may, and sometimes ought, with respect, to admonish his superior.(Challoner)