And it is yet far more evident: for that after the similitude of Melchisedec there ariseth another priest,

And what we say is yet more abundantly evident, if after the likeness of Melchizedek there ariseth another priest,

And it is yet more abundantly most evident, if according to the similitude of Melchisedek there doth arise another priest,

And it is yet more abundantly evident, since a different priest arises according to the similitude of Melchisedec,

And it is yet a more euident thing, because that after the similitude of Melchi-sedec, there is risen vp another Priest,

And it is yet a more evydent thinge yf after the similitude of Melchisedech ther aryse a nother prest

And it is still far more evident, if according to the likeness of Melchizedek, there arises another priest,

And it is yet far more evident: for that after the similitude of Melchisedec there rises another priest,

And it is yet far more evident, if, after the likeness of Melchisedec, there arises another priest,

And this is even more clear if a second priest has come up who is like Melchizedek,

And this point is even more clear if another priest like Melchizedek appears,

and it is yet more abundantly evident, that there should arise another priest after the likeness of Melchisedec,

And it is yet far more manifest: if there arises another priest who is like unto Melchisedec,

And it is yet far more evident: for that after the similitude of Melchisedec there ariseth another priest,

And it is still more clear, if another priest according to the likeness of Melchizedek arises,

And it is still more abundantly clear that if another priest arises according to the likeness of Melchizedek,

And it is still far more evident, since there arises a different priest after the likeness of Melchizedek,

This is yet more abundantly evident, if after the likeness of Melchizedek there arises another priest,

This is yet more abundantly evident, if after the likeness of Melchizedek there arises another priest,

This is yet more abundantly evident, if after the likeness of Melchizedek there arises another priest,

And it is still more abundantly evident, if after the likeness of Melchizedek there ariseth a different priest,

All this becomes even yet plainer when we remember that a new priest has appeared, resembling Melchizedek,

All this becomes even yet plainer when we remember that a new priest has appeared, resembling Melchizedek,

And it is yet far more evident: for that after the similitude of Melchisedec there ariseth another priest,

And it is yet far more evident: for that after the similitude of Melchisedec there ariseth another priest,

And, yet more abundantly evident it is—that, according to the likeness of Melchizedek, there is to be raised up, a different priest.

And it is yet far more evident: for that after the similitude of Melchizedek there ariseth another priest,

All this becomes even yet plainer when we remember that a new priest has appeared, resembling Melchizedek,

And it is yet far more evident: for that after the embodiment of Melchisedec there arises another priest,

And it is yet far more evident: for that after the similitude of Melchisedec there ariseth another priest,