Protestantism
English
Delicate living is not seemly for a fool; Much less for a servant to have rule over princes.
Luxury is not comely for a fool, Much less for a servant to rule among princes.
Good living beseemeth not a fool; how much less for a servant to have rule over princes.
Pleasure is not comely for a foole, much lesse for a seruant to haue rule ouer princes.
Luxurious living is not fitting for a fool, much less for a servant to have rule over rulers.
Delight is not seemly for a fool; much less for a servant to have rule over princes.
Material comfort is not good for the foolish; much less for a servant to be put over rulers.
Luxury is unseemly for a fool— how much worse for a slave to rule over princes!
Luxury is not seemly for a fool; much less for a servant to have rule over princes.
Delight is not suitable for a fool; much less for a servant to have rule over princes.
Delight is not seemly for a fool; much less for a servant to have rule over princes.
For a fool living in luxury is not fitting, any more than it is for a slave to rule over princes.
Luxury is not becoming for a fool, much less for a servant to rule over princes.
Luxury is not becoming for a fool; much less for a servant to have rule over princes.
Delicate living is not appropriate for a fool, much less for a servant to have rule over princes.
Delicate living is not appropriate for a fool, much less for a servant to have rule over princes.
Delicate living is not appropriate for a fool, much less for a servant to have rule over princes.
Luxury is not seemly for a fool; Much less should a servant have rule over princes.
Delight is not seemly for a fool; much less for a servant to have rule over princes.
Unseemly for a dullard, is delicate living, how much more for, a servant, to bear rule over princes.
Delight is not proper for a fool; much less for a servant to have rule over princes.
Delight is not suitable for a fool; much less for a servant to have rule over princes.
Catholicism