Protestantism
English
And the king was exceeding sorry; yet for his oath’s sake, and for their sakes which sat with him, he would not reject her.
And the king was exceeding sorry; but for the sake of his oaths, and of them that sat at meat, he would not reject her.
And the king--made very sorrowful--because of the oaths and of those reclining (at meat) with him, would not put her away,
And the king, [while] made very sorry, on account of the oaths and those lying at table with [him] would not break his word with her.
Then the King was very sory: yet for his othes sake, and for their sakes which sate at table with him, he would not refuse her.
And ye kynge was sory: howbe it for his othes sake and for their sakes which sate at supper also he wolde not put her besyde her purpose.
And the king, who became exceeding sorry, did not want to refuse her because of the oaths, and of those dining together.
And the king was exceeding sorry; yet for his oath’s sake, and for their sakes which sat with him, he would not reject her.
And the king was very sad; yet, on account of his oath and his guests, he would not reject her.
And the king was very sad; but because of his oaths, and those who were with him at table, he would not say 'No' to her.
The king was consumed with sorrow, but because of his oaths and his guests, he did not want to refuse her.
And the king was exceedingly sorry; yet on account of his oath, and those who sat with him, he would not refuse her.
And the king was exceeding sorry, [yet] for his oath's sake and for the sakes of those who sat with him, he would not reject her.
And the king was exceeding sorry; yet for his oath’s sake, and for their sakes which sat with him, he would not reject her.
And although he1 was deeply grieved, the king, because of his2 oaths and ⌞dinner guests⌟,3 did not want to refuse her.
- *Here “although” is supplied as a component of the participle (“was”) which is understood as concessive
- Literally “the”; the Greek article is used here as a possessive pronoun
- Literally “those who were reclining at table”
And becoming deeply grieved, but because of the oaths and those reclining together, the king did not wish to reject her.
And becoming deeply grieved, the king, because of his oath, and those reclining together, he did not wish to reject her.
And the king was exceedingly sorry, but for the sake of his oaths, and of his dinner guests, he did not wish to refuse her.
And the king was exceedingly sorry, but for the sake of his oaths, and of his dinner guests, he did not wish to refuse her.
And the king was exceedingly sorry, but for the sake of his oaths, and of his dinner guests, he did not wish to refuse her.
And the king was exceedingly sorry; but on account of his oaths, and of those at table with him, he would not refuse her.
The king was much distressed; yet, because of his oath and of the guests at his table, he did not like to refuse her.
The king was much distressed; yet, because of his oath and of the guests at his table, he did not like to refuse her.
And the king was exceeding sorry; yet for his oath’s sake, and for their sakes which sat with him, he would not reject her.
And the king was exceeding sorry; yet for his oath's sake, and for their sakes which sat with him, he would not reject her.
And, though the king was, very grieved, yet, by reason of the oaths, and of them who were reclining, he would not refuse her.
And the king was exceeding sorry; yet for his oath’s sake, and for their sakes who sat with him, he would not reject her.
The King was much distressed; yet, on account of his oath and of the guests at his table, he did not like to refuse her.
And the king was exceeding sorry; yet for his oath's sake, and for their sakes which sat with him, he would not reject her.
Catholicism
English
And the king was struck sad. Yet because of his oath, and because of them that were with him at table, he would not displease her: