Therefore if the uncircumcision keep the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?

If therefore the uncircumcision keep the ordinances of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be reckoned for circumcision?

If, therefore the uncircumcision the righteousness of the law may keep, shall not his uncircumcision for circumcision be reckoned?

If therefore the uncircumcision keep the requirements of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be reckoned for circumcision,

Therefore if the vncircumcision keepe the ordinances of the Lawe, shall not his vncircumcision be counted for circumcision?

Therfore if the vncircumcised kepe the ryght thinges contayned in the lawe: shall not his vncircumcision be counted for circumcision?

If therefore a man of uncircumcision keeps the ordinances of the law, will not his uncircumcision be considered circumcision?

Therefore if the uncircumcision keep the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?

If, then, he who is uncircumcised keeps the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?

If those who have not circumcision keep the rules of the law, will it not be credited to them as circumcision?

If a man who is not circumcised keeps the requirements of the law, will not his uncircumcision be regarded as circumcision?

If then the uncircumcision observe the righteous judgments of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be accounted for circumcision?

Therefore if the uncircumcised keep the righteousness of the law, shall not his foreskin be counted for circumcision?

Therefore if the uncircumcision keep the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?

Therefore, if the uncircumcised person follows the requirements of the law, will not his uncircumcision be credited for circumcision?

If, then, the uncircumcision keeps the demands of the Law, will not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?

If then the uncircumcision keeps the ordinances of the Law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?

If therefore the uncircumcised keep the ordinances of the law, won't his uncircumcision be accounted as circumcision?

If therefore the uncircumcised keep the ordinances of the law, won't his uncircumcision be accounted as circumcision?

If therefore the uncircumcised keep the ordinances of the law, won't his uncircumcision be accounted as circumcision?

If then he who is uncircumcised keep the precepts of the Law, shall not he though uncircumcised be regarded as circumcised?

If, then, an uncircumcised man pays regard to the requirements of the law, will not he, although not circumcised, be regarded by God as if he were?

If, then, an uncircumcised man pays regard to the requirements of the law, will not he, although not circumcised, be regarded by God as if he were?

Therefore if the uncircumcision keep the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?

Therefore if the uncircumcision keep the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?

If then, the uncircumcision, be guarding the righteous requirement of the law, shall not, his uncircumcision, as circumcision be reckoned?—

Therefore if the uncircumcision keepeth the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?

If, then, an uncircumcised man pays regard to the requirements of the Law, will not he, although not circumcised, be regarded by God as if he were?

Therefore if the uncircumcision keep the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?

Therefore, if the uncircumcision keepeth the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?